Search

Tag Cloud

Archive

Subscribe

Subscribe VIA RSS

Galapagos: Rights of Nature Versus Climate Change Wrongs

Date: July 2, 2018

There’s something very special about Ecuador that sets it apart from all other nations: it was the first country to recognize the rights of nature in its constitution, newly ratified by the majority of Ecuadorians in September 2008. 

Most nations treat nature as property. But under the law in Ecuador, Rights of Nature articles acknowledge that “Nature, or Pacha Mama, where life is reproduced and occurs, has the right to integral respect for its existence and for the maintenance and regeneration of its life cycles, structure, functions and evolutionary processes.”

Now, however, according to a new report, half of that nature is in danger of disappearing.

Half of Galapagos wildlife species could soon be gone


On March 14, 2018, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Australia’s James Cook University and England’s University of East Anglia published a report titled Wildlife in a Warming World that stated that as much as half of all the wildlife species and 60 percent of the plant species in the world’s most biodiverse areas could be at risk of extinction by 2100 if stronger efforts aren’t taken to combat climate change. The Galapagos Islands are one of those named, biodiverse regions.

The recent study warns that rising temperatures and associated phenomena—such as prolonged droughts, erratic rainfall patterns and extreme storms—could have disastrous effects not only on the Galapagos Islands but in the Amazon River Basin, in southwestern Australia, and on Caribbean and European coasts.

To conduct the study, researchers examined the impact of climate change on nearly 80,000 species of plants and animals in 35 of the world’s most naturally rich areas—WWF’s “Priority Places”—which include the Galapagos. They tested for three scenarios: 

1) a 2-degree Celsius rise in global temperatures above preindustrial levels, the upper threshold stated in the Paris Agreement, and warming does not increase thereafter; 
2) the 3.2-degree Celsius increase that the United Nations warns is now the estimated forecast for the end of this century; and 
3) a 4.5-degree Celsius jump that will occur if carbon emissions continue to rise unchecked from current rates (the “business as usual” scenario). The authors note that even though this acts as the “worst case” in this study, a higher level of climate change is possible by 2100.

Results showed that if global temperatures rose by 3.2 degrees Celsius, 60 percent of plant life and 50 percent of wildlife in the Priority Places could be lost. If temperatures should rise by 4.5 degrees Celsius, that risk increases dramatically; and it would be catastrophic for the fauna and flora in particularly vulnerable areas, such as the Miombo Woodlands in southern Africa, where 90 percent of amphibians and 80 percent or more of birdlife, mammals and plants could vanish.

The rights of nature could soon be irrelevant

There is some hope. The study’s authors conclude that there are two methods by which this ecological toll might be reduced. One is dispersal, or allowing species to migrate to new, less vulnerable territory. Using this strategy, extinction could be decreased by 20 to 25 percent—if global temperature increases are kept to 2 degrees Celsius. The other, and more effective method, they say, is mitigation, or curtailing greenhouse gas emissions more ambitiously than we’re currently cutting them back to minimize temperature increases. Unfortunately, even under a best-case mitigation scenario, many parts of the world would still be rendered uninhabitable to numerous species.

 

The words of Tanya Steele, chief executive of WWF, were telling, when she told the United Kingdom’s Independent newspaper: “Within our children’s lifetime, places like the Amazon and Galapagos Islands could become unrecognizable, with half the species that live there wiped out by human-caused climate change.”

In protecting our planet’s wildlife, I wish it were as simple as working to make other nations as enlightened about granting legal rights to nature as Ecuador is—even though that alone would be hard enough. But we have a much tougher fight first: making sure that those animals and plants are still around to fight for. 

Feature image: Cacti are a major food source for many animals throughout much of the Galapagos. But during heavy rains, cacti can get waterlogged and topple over. The plants need long-term protection in this era of rapid climate change. ©Andrew Turner, flickr 

 

Candice_andrews
Candice Gaukel Andrews

A multiple award-winning author and writer specializing in nature-travel topics and environmental issues, Candice has traveled around the world, from the Arctic Circle to Antarctica, and from New Zealand to Scotland's far northern, remote regions. Her assignments have been equally diverse, from covering Alaska’s Yukon Quest dogsled race to writing a history of the Galapagos Islands to describing and photographing the national snow-sculpting competition in her home state of Wisconsin. In addition to being a five-time book author, Candice's work has also appeared in several national and international publications, such as The Huffington Post and Outside Magazine Online. To read her web columns and see samples of her nature photography, visit her website at www.candiceandrews.com and like her Nature Traveler Facebook page at www.facebook.com/naturetraveler.


Comments

David Wappler
over 1 year ago
D4577fa293ec37771df0fb51aa99c687

Thank you, Candice, for your very relevant and very timely post. The Ecuadorian Constitution is an inspiration for positive action to stop the destruction.

Thomas Nesler
over 1 year ago
3cae40981af19631437101cbdb68fa99

Rights of Nature? There are none. Rights are a human concept, made into reality and enforceable only by a human society. For the Earth's biota, survival and the opportunity to survive are mostly a question of fitness and adaptability. As a global society, we've already missed the best window of opportunity to alter our consumptive ways and the magnitude of estimated climate change. Feel badly for the generations that are going to inherit this ecological crisis.

Margaret Fusari
over 1 year ago
09eb6f778034d26d114778cd85eadd3b

The point is that Rights have been granted, by humans, to nature. The point is that survival depends also on the environment and humans are creating that environment. The point is: Don't give up, ever.

Nina Zapala
over 1 year ago
749198eb7b5f43be89537dd39f2ad65e

This quote breaks my heart but I'm so happy that you shared this article. "The words of Tanya Steele, chief executive of WWF, were telling, when she told the United Kingdom’s Independent newspaper: Within our children’s lifetime, places like the Amazon and Galapagos Islands could become unrecognizable, with half the species that live there wiped out by human-caused climate change." Thank you!

Steve Schmidt
over 1 year ago
0026823174f66eb45c03eff32a993566

The flawed idea that animals have rights diminishes arguments for wildlife conservation. Wildlife/animals do not have rights. Please do not repeat this assertion. Thank you.

Need help planning a trip?
Get help from one of IGTOA's Members.
Travelers_guide
Travel_with_igtoa
Conservation_fund